This bicentennial year is a special opportunity to analyze our history, what we did right and know about what things we made mistakes. The first paragraph of this essay could be read as a abstract of the point of view that political class, mass media and common people have about the bicentennial and our history. I want to write from an alternative point of view that many times is forgotten.
First of all, we cannot deny the technological progress and the improvement of the live conditions of the majority of the Chilean population. For example, today in Chile there are just a few ‘campamentos’ compare whit the decade of ’50 or ’60. For the other hand, we have achievement to reduce mortality rates and increase life expectancy. Throughout the Chilean history there has been material progress, in the sense of all the basic conditions of live.
As a correlate of this history of progress there is another history, many times deny or many times forgotten. This history tells us about the underdevelopment Chile, but not in the economic sense, because we are just a few steps from the final goal: the economic development. When I say underdevelopment I mean in the social dimension. Throughout the Chilean history there has been a tendency to deny all the social injustices and the antagonism between social groups. This 200 years of history must be, I argue, read as a constantly effort of the dominant class (in the XIX century was de oligarchy, during the XX century was the industrial bourgeoisie, today is the financial and commercial capital) to expand their business and their earns. And, in the other hand, there have been efforts to stop his social project, in the sense of social interest development, by the social movements in many times of the Chilean history.
What I want to express in this essay is that Chile has been always divide, has been always a under conflict –explicit or implicit. The Chilean history is about social projects in conflict, there has been always an antagonism between social groups. Ideology is the cultural representation or discourse that tries to hide the social antagonism under the veil of reconciliation. Today, we are in presence of the more sophisticated kind of ideology: for most parts of Chilean population the history of Chile is about a lineal progress and democratic constitution, although, in the other hand, the Chilean history is about exploitation, social struggles and antagonism.